Showing posts with label Charts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Charts. Show all posts

Friday, June 29, 2012

U.S. Crude Oil Production in First Quarter of 2012 Highest in 14 Years

EIA, Today in Energy, June 8, 2012
[Click on chart to enlarge]
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Petroleum Supply Monthly

Strong growth in U.S. crude oil production since the fourth quarter of 2011 is due mainly to higher output from North Dakota, Texas,and federal leases in the Gulf of Mexico, with total U.S. production during the first quarter of 2012 topping 6 million barrels per day (bbl/d) for the first time in 14 years.

After remaining steady between 5.5 million and 5.6 million bbl/d during each of the first three quarters of 2011, EIA estimates that U.S. average quarterly oil production grew to over 5.9 million bbl/d during the fourth quarter and then surpassed 6 million bbl/d during the first quarter of 2012, according to the latest output estimates from EIA's May Petroleum Supply Monthly report (see chart below). The last time U.S. quarterly oil production was above 6 million bbl/d was during October-December 1998.
[Click on chart to enlarge]
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Petroleum Supply Monthly

The roughly 6% growth in U.S. oil production from October 2011 through March 2012 is largely the result of increases in oil output in North Dakota, Texas, and the Gulf of Mexico. After passing California in December 2011 to become the third largest oil producing state, North Dakota then jumped ahead of Alaska in March 2012 as the state with the second largest oil output [Please see remarks below -- D.R.]. Texas remains far ahead in the number one production spot. [Full story]

(Please see my post "North Dakota Tops Alaska in Oil Production, Trailing Only Texas," including my remarks. North Dakota produced an average of 609,000 barrels of crude oil every day in April 2012, another record, and up from 577,000 barrels a day in March 2012, according to EIA. Also, please see "EIA Expects Higher U.S. Crude Production,Aaron and David Rachovich, "U.S. Crude Oil Production, 1970-2011 -- EIA" and "Texas Crude Oil Production, Jan 2007-Jul 2012" -- D.R.)     

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Five States Accounted for about 56% of Total U.S. Crude Oil Production in 2011

EIA, Today in Energy, Mar 14, 2012
[Click on chart to enlarge]
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Petroleum Supply Monthly.
Note: Production data includes crude oil and lease condensate.
Download CSV Data
Combined oil production (crude oil and lease condensate) from the top five U.S. oil-producing states increased during 2011 (see chart above). The biggest gains were in North Dakota and Texas, due in large part to increased horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing activity. Texas, Alaska, California, North Dakota, and Oklahoma accounted for about 56% of U.S. oil production last year, according to EIA's February Petroleum Supply Monthly report.

Highlights from the top oil-producing states in 2011 included:





  • Texas. The Eagle Ford shale formation in south Texas contributed to gains in the state's oil production, which averaged 1,425 thousand barrels per day (bbl/d), the highest level since 1997. [Update: for the Eagle Ford production, please my post/remarks here -- D.R.]   
  • Alaska. Oil production fell for the ninth year in row, averaging 563 thousand bbl/d.
  • California. Oil production averaged 535 thousand bbl/d, the lowest level in at least three decades.
  • North Dakota. Preliminary data indicate increasing oil production from the Bakken formation pushed North Dakota ahead of California in December as the third biggest oil-producing state. North Dakota's oil production averaged 535 thousand bbl/d in December 2011 and 419 thousand bbl/d for the year.
  • Oklahoma. Oil production averaged 204 thousand bbl/d during 2011, topping 200 thousand bbl/d for the first time since 1998.

[Click on chart to enlarge]
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Petroleum Supply Monthly.
Note: Production data includes crude oil and lease condensate.
Download CSV Data [Full story]

(Also, please see "United States: Top 8 Crude Oil Producing States, 2006-Feb.2011." North Dakota has overtaken California as the third-largest oil-producing state in the nation. Production totals released [...] by both states show North Dakota pumped 16.9 million barrels of oil in January [2012], compared with California's 15.8 million barrels. North Dakota had a daily average of 546,000 barrels, besting California by more than 36,000 barrels---please see newsok.com Mar 8, 2012. Update: Crude oil output in North Dakota reached a record high in February [2012] as a mild winter boosted activity in the Bakken shale prospect, bringing the state closer to overtaking Alaska as the second-largest oil producer in the country. North Dakota crude oil production rose by about 12,000 barrels per day (bpd), to more than 558,000 bpd, data from the state regulator showed [...], affirming the state's position as the third-largest producing state in the union after Texas and Alaska---please see Reuters, Apr 11, 2012 Update 2: North Dakota passed Alaska in March 2012 to become the second-leading state in crude oil production, trailing only Texas---please see my post "North Dakota Tops Alaska in Oil Production, Trailing Only Texas."-- D.R.)

Friday, March 16, 2012

The U.S. Surpassed Russia as World's Leading Producer of Dry Natural Gas in 2009 and 2010

EIA, Today in Energy, Mar 13, 2012
[Click on chart to enlarge]

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration. Download CSV Data

EIA estimates of annual dry natural gas production indicate that the United States surpassed Russia as the world's leading producer of dry natural gas beginning in 2009 when Russian production dropped in conjunction with the economic downturn and reduced demand (see chart above). Both countries produced more than 20 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of dry natural gas in 2010. Definitive comparisons of natural gas production trends in the two countries are imprecise due to differences in terminology and reporting methodologies.

Dry natural gas production in the United States rose 18% between 2005 and 2010—mainly due to growth in shale gas production. Increased use of horizontal drilling in conjunction with hydraulic fracturing spurred natural gas supply gains. Other factors contributed to gains in natural gas production: improved site planning and field optimization, multi-well drilling from a single pad, rising associated natural gas production from oil plays, and improved drill-bit technology. According to Lippman Consulting, annual shale natural gas production in key shale plays grew from 1.6 Tcf to 7.2 Tcf between 2007 and 2011 (see chart below).
[Click on chart to enlarge]

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, based on Lippman Consulting, Inc.
Note: Lippman Consulting, Inc. gross withdrawal estimates, as of December 2011, converted to dry production estimates with EIA-calculated average gross-to-dry shrinkage factors by state and/or shale play.

Since 1996, Russia's dry natural gas production record has been mixed. It was relatively unchanged between 1996 and 2001, grew to almost 22 Tcf in 2006, and then remained relatively stable before declining in 2009. Two factors leading to this decline were a slow-down in domestic natural gas consumption in Russia and Russian suppliers' cutbacks to match reduced gas needs in Europe. Russian dry natural gas production rebounded somewhat in 2010, although the best available data indicate it remained about 2% lower than U.S. production of natural gas that year. [Full story]

(Also, according to the BP data, in 2010, the U.S. has surpassed Russia as the world's top natural gas producer for the second consecutive year---please see "World's Top 21 Natural Gas Producers, 2005-2010 -- BP." In addition, please see "World's Top 15 Natural Gas Proven Reserve Holders, Jan 1, 2012 -- OGJ." -- D.R.)

Saturday, October 15, 2011

Angolan Oil Production Has Doubled Since 2003

EIA, Today in Energy, Oct 14, 2011

 Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Angola Country Analysis Brief & Short-Term Energy Outlook Table 3c: OPEC Crude Oil Production.Download CSV Data [Note: Presumably, crude oil production excluding condensates since the mid-2000s -- D.R.]

Angola has emerged as Africa's second largest oil producer [after Nigeria, and please see remarks below -- D.R.]; its oil production has grown 147% since 2000. Angola is the eighth largest supplier of crude oil to the United States [please see remarks below -- D.R.] and the second largest crude supplier to China, according to data for January through July 2011. Angola is still rebuilding from a 27-year civil war that ended in 2002. Security issues remain, especially in the disputed oil-rich Cabinda exclave. Border disputes have halted some oil developments.

A member of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), Angola has production targets ranging from 1.52 to 1.66 million barrels per day (bbl/d); however, the country is currently increasing its oil production and capacity. In 2010, Angola produced about 1.85 million bbl/d of crude oil [excluding condensates -- D.R.] and, given very low levels of domestic consumption, exported all but 50 thousand bbl/d.

Oil is crucial to the Angolan economy, accounting for over 95% of export revenues and over 75% of government revenue. In 2010, Angola exported almost 1.8 million bbl/d of crude oil; the majority of crude oil exports went to China (45%) and the United States (23%), representing 17% and 4% of those countries' total crude oil imports, respectively.

Production in 2011 is down, averaging 1.65 million bbl/d, due to temporary technical problems. Industry analysts expect Angolan production to grow beyond 1.85 million bbl/d by the end of 2011, and perhaps reach 2.5 to 3 million bbl/d of capacity by 2016, based on planned project startups.

International oil companies, including Chevron, ExxonMobil, Total, Eni, and BP, play a major role in Angola, operating most production. The Angolan government recently held a licensing round for a pre-selected group of private companies to explore and produce in the country's pre-salt offshore areas—an area believed to be of similar geological makeup to the Brazilian pre-salt.

China is a major investor in Angola and has provided several multi-billion dollar oil-backed loans to fund infrastructure development. The China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec) and China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) are among the national oil companies working in Angola. Angola is now the second largest supplier of oil to China, behind Saudi Arabia.

According to EIA's recently released Angola Country Analysis Brief, Angola had 10.9 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of natural gas reserves in 2011, up from an estimated 2 Tcf in 2007. Natural gas production in Angola is tied directly to oil production and is often vented or flared, with limited volumes consumed domestically. An Angolan liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal, due to commence operation in 2012, will allow Angola to export its natural gas and reduce flaring. [Full story]

(Please see Aaron and David Rachovich, "Africa's Top 8 Oil Producers, 2006-2010 -- EIA." Angola was in 2009-2010/full year the seventh largest supplier of crude oil to the United States---please see our post "U.S. Crude Oil Imports from Top 15 Countries ... -- EIA." According to Oil and Gas Journal (OGJ), Angola's proved oil reserves stood at 9.5 billion bbl as of Jan 1, 2011---please see our post "World's Top 22 Proven Oil Reserves Holders, Jan 1, 2011 -- OGJ," while BP Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2011, places Angolan proved oil reserves as high as 13.5 billion bbl---please see our post "World's Top 23 Proven Oil Reserves Holders, 2007-2010 -- BP." -- D.R.)

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

United Kingdom Natural Gas and Oil Production Continues Decade-Long Decline

EIA, Today in Energy, Sept 21, 2011

 Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, United Kingdom Country Analysis Brief.Download CSV Data

The United Kingdom (U.K.) is the largest producer of oil and second-largest producer of natural gas in the European Union [after the Netherlands -- D.R.]. Due to steadily declining production since the early 2000s, the U.K. became a net importer of natural gas and oil in 2004 and 2005, respectively.

In 2010, the U.K. produced 1.4 million barrels per day (bbl/d) of oil and consumed 1.6 million bbl/d. [Please see remarks below -- D.R.]. While consumption remained relatively constant throughout the last decade, 2010 production declined 7% from 2009. Further declines are expected: the U.S. Energy Information Administration's Short-Term Energy Outlook predicts the U.K.'s production will fall to 1.2 million bbl/d in 2012. Despite decreasing production, the U.K. remains one of the European Union's leading petroleum exporters; in 2010, the U.K. exported 832,000 bbl/d, more than half of its total production.

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, United Kingdom Country Analysis Brief.Download CSV Data

In 2010, U.K. natural gas production was 2.0 trillion cubic feet, a 5% drop from 2009, and the lowest level since 1992. Natural gas consumption rose 7% in 2010. To offset its declining natural gas production in the North Sea, the U.K. is importing more liquefied natural gas (LNG). Deliveries of LNG to the U.K. were up 0.86 billion cubic feet per day, or 54%, during the first nine months of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.

Because discoveries of new oil and natural gas reserves have not outpaced the maturation of existing oil and natural gas fields, production from both has declined. The U.K.'s increasing reliance on imported natural gas and oil has spurred the government to develop energy policies to focus on enhanced oil and gas recovery, as well as increased cooperation with Norway—U.K.'s largest oil supplier. The U.K. has also invested heavily in renewable energy; according to the U.K. Department of Energy and Climate Change, the U.K. has the largest offshore wind resource in the world.

EIA's United Kingdom Country Analysis Brief features additional analysis of these trends, along with a broad discussion of the U.K.'s energy sector. [Full story]

(Note that oil production refers to the total oil supply, including the production of crude oil, natural gas plant liquids, and other liquids, and refinery processing gain. While oil consumption refers to the total petroleum consumption, including internal consumption, refinery fuel and loss, and bunkering. UK crude oil production, including lease condensate, dropped to 1.2 million bbl/d in 2010, from about 2.7 million bbl/d in 1999. According to Oil and Gas Journal (OGJ), UK's proved oil reserves stood at 2.858 billion bbl as of Jan 1, 2011, a decrease of 7.4% when compared with the Jan 1, 2010. Also, according to OGJ, the UK had 9,040 billion cubic feet (bcf) of proven natural gas reserves as of Jan 1, 2011, a 12% decline from the previous year. -- D.R.)

Sunday, July 31, 2011

Colombia's Oil Production at Highest Level since 1999

EIA, Today in Energy, Jul 14, 2011

                                  [Bar Сhart: Colombia's Oil Production*]
*Total oil supply, which includes the production of crude oil (including lease condensates), natural gas plant liquids, and other liquids, and refinery processing gain. -- D.R. 
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Short-Term Energy Outlook. Download CSV Data

Colombia's oil production set a new record in May 2011, reaching an average output of 927 thousand barrels per day (bbl/d) [Colombia achieved a record-high crude oil output of 927,000 bbl/d in May 2011, up from 903,000 bbl/d in April 2011, Colombia's Energy and Mines Minister, Carlos Rodado Noriega, said. Crude oil production in Colombia in May 2011 reached 923,000 bbl/d compared with 902,000 bbl/d in April 2011 and 776,000 bbl/d in the year-ago month, i.e. May 2010, according to preliminary statistics from the Colombian hydrocarbons regulator ANH. -- D.R.]. Average annual production increased by more than 30% [sic] between 2005 and 2010. EIA expects Colombia's production to continue growing in the near future. The June 2011 Short-Term Energy Outlook projects average annual production to increase from 800 thousand bbl/d in 2010 to 910 thousand bbl/d in 2011 and 980 thousand bbl/d in 2012.

Two factors primarily contributed to Colombia's expanded production:

  • Improved Security: Colombia reported only 31 attacks against pipelines in 2010 compared with hundreds of such incidents that occurred per year in the early 2000s.
  • Regulatory Changes: Since 1999, the Colombian government has sought to improve the investment climate. Foreign direct investment has improved due to longer exploration licenses, lower royalty rates, and expanded opportunities for private companies to operate oil ventures.
In 2010, Colombia exported 504 thousand bbl/d of its oil production, with 365 thousand bbl/d [of crude oil and petroleum products. Also, please see my post "U.S. Crude Oil Imports from Top 15 Countries, Dec 2010 and Full Year 2010 -- EIA." -- D.R.] going to the United States [The U.S. is the largest destination for Colombia's oil exports. China was Colombia's second-largest oil export destination in 2010, followed by Japan. -- D.R.]. Imports from Colombia helped offset declines in U.S. imports from Mexico and Venezuela. EIA's recently released Country Analysis Brief for Colombia features additional analysis on these trends, along with a broad discussion of Colombia's energy sector. [Full story]

(In 2010, Colombia's crude oil production, including lease condensate, also was at its highest level since 1999. In 2010, it averaged 785,526 barrels per day. Also, please see Aaron and David Rachovich, "Top 6 Oil Producers in Central & South America, 2006-Feb. 2011 -- EIA." -- D.R.)

Friday, June 24, 2011

World Watch [IEA Oil Release]

by Vincent Lauerman, New York, EI, Jun 23, 2011
International Energy Agency (IEA) Executive Director Nobuo Tanaka announced on Thursday [June 23] that the consumer organization's 28 member countries had agreed to release 60 million barrels of oil stocks – including 30 million bbl from the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve [SPR] – in the coming month. Tanaka was following up on his implicit threat in May to unlock the reserves if Opec did not agree to increase supplies at its failed Jun. 8 meeting. The IEA has released strategic stocks twice before [please see details below -- D.R.], but this release clearly breaks with historical precedent [also, according to Peter Kemp, the IEA's release of oil stocks marks a new turn in oil market intervention---please see "World Watch," EI, Jun 24, 2011 -- D.R.]. Although the IEA framed the release in terms of the ongoing supply disruption in Libya, market sources say there is no actual shortage of physical crude. The IEA is instead making a pre-emptive move, looking ahead to “the threat of a serious market tightening” in the second half of the year, at a time when “world economies are still recovering.” Economic growth has been weakening, especially in OECD countries such as the US [...]

(In its 37-year history the IEA has collectively agreed to release strategic petroleum stocks only twice before to fill lost supplies -- in 1991 at the outbreak of the first Gulf War following Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, and in 2005 after Hurricane Katrina damaged offshore oil rigs, pipelines and oil refineries in the Gulf of Mexico. Separately, please also see Petroleum Economist (PE) commentary -- The IEA's release of crude from strategic stocks is less about Libya than about the global economy - and it should send oil prices tumbling, says the editor of PE Derek Brower. Also, please see retweets by me on Twitter dated June 23, here. The IEA has been warning since the turn of the year of rising oil burden -- "Were $100/bbl oil to become entrenched in 2011, that would risk pushing the [oil burden] figure through 5%," IEA said---please see my post "IEA Warns of Rising Oil Burden." The price of crude, if sustained at $100 a barrel or more for the rest of 2011, would cause similar demand destruction as the world experienced in 2008 that led to the global economic crisis, Nobuo Tanaka, IEA executive director, said---please see The Telegraph, Apr 20, 2011. Please compare the above-mentioned analysis to the IEA's official position -- The use of IEA strategic stocks "is not about price but rather about ensuring an adequately supplied market to protect the world economy from unnecessary damage when it is in a fragile state." [?]---please see IEA: Key Questions answered on the release of oil stocks or more precisely "IEA collective action – June 23, 2011: FAQ." The SPR crude oil stocks are stored in underground salt caverns along the Gulf of Mexico Coast. Currently, there are a historically high 726.6 million barrels of crude oil in SPR, close to its 727.0 million barrel capacity. Historically, releases from the SPR have taken one of two forms, either an exchange, where oil provided in the release is then repaid within a specified time, or sales, where oil is auctioned off in a competitive bidding process. The United States has released crude oil from the SPR a number of times since 1985, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. The most recent release was the 5.4 million barrel exchange following Hurricanes Gustav and Ike in September 2008. To date, the largest release was a 30 million barrel exchange in the fall of 2000 in response to low heating oil supplies in the Northeast region of the United States---please see chart below and U.S. Energy Information Administration/EIA, Today in Energy, Jun 24, 2011, here. -- D.R.)
              [Click on chart to enlarge]

 

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

[...] US Ambassador [to Canada] Backs Increased Canadian Oil-Sands Imports

Petroleum Economist, June 9, 2011
The US government considers Canadian oil supplies an essential ingredient of energy security, even as competition for resources and assets ratchets up with rival China.

Speaking in Calgary, US ambassador to Canada David Jacobson described his country's need for greater imports from stable sources such as Canada to offset dependence on unstable regimes in the Middle East and North Africa. "The US sees Canada as a pillar of our energy security," he said.

It is already the largest energy-trading relationship in history, with Canada accounting for about 22% of US import demand [please see my post "U.S. Crude Oil Imports from Top 15 Countries, Dec 2010 and Full Year 2010," -- Canada supplied about 22% of total US crude oil imports in 2010, i.e., 1.97 million b/d of crude/please also see chart below, out of a total US imports of crude of 9.16 million b/d, as well as about 22% of total US crude oil and products imports in 2010, i.e., 2.532 million barrels per day---1.97 million b/d of crude oil plus 0.56 million b/d of petroleum products---out of a total US imports of crude and products of 11.753 million b/d -- D.R.). Alberta alone pumps about 1.4 million b/d to US refineries or 7% of overall US consumption [U.S. oil consumption increased by some 380,000 b/d or 2.0% to 19.148 million b/d in 2010, compared to the previous year---please see my post "Top 25 World Oil Consumers, 2009-2010." Separately, of the estimated 2.9 million b/d, sic, of crude oil produced in Canada in 2010, 1.5 million b/d of that was derived from the oil sands of Alberta---please see EIA. -- D.R.].

Canada long ago surpassed Saudi Arabia as the top supplier to the world's largest oil consumer and that relationship is poised to grow exponentially as Canadian producers increase production of oil-sands crude.

Canadian exports to the US have more than doubled since 1993 [US imports from Canada of crude oil increased from 900,000 b/d in 1993 to 1,972,000 b/d in 2010, and US imports from Canada of crude oil and petroleum products increased from 1,181,000 b/d in 1993 to 2,532,000 b/d in 2010 -- D.R.] and are set to double and quadruple over the next two decades.

According to IHS Cera, Canadian oil sands could supply 6.3 million b/d by 2035, not including any other conventional and unconventional production that would push the figure past 7 million b/d. Only Russia and Saudi Arabia would have larger output, IHC Cera added, vaulting Canada into the top tier of oil-producing nations. [...]

But that looming reality seems lost on US President Barack Obama, who has seemed to be reluctant to fully embrace the oil sands even as he has talked of the need to reduce imports from unstable and hostile regimes.

A series of nagging doubts have led some Canadian observers to question the president's energy priorities. For instance, the State Department has held up approvals for TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline to the Gulf coast [where there are more refineries capable of handling the unusually thick crude, i.e. the heavy, high-sulphur bitumen, and please see map below -- D.R.] while it carries out environmental assessments of the carbon intensity of Canadian oil sands and heavy crude in a move seen as bowing to environmental groups. [...]
                  [Click on map to enlarge]
                                                                    Source: PE, here.
Fearing the worst from Obama's climate-change and clean-energy initiatives, the Canadian and Alberta governments have lobbied against the adoption of clean-fuel standards and other environmental policies they claim would discriminate against Canada. [...]

Feeling snubbed by this seeming US indifference, Canada has been courting Asia, and particularly the Chinese, as an alternate buyer of its growing output.

China consumes less than half as much oil as the US [please see my posts "Top 25 World Oil Consumers, 2009-2010 -- EIA." and "Top 21 World Oil Consumers, 2007-2010 -- BP," -- D.R.], but will overtake it in a matter of decades, said Wenran Jiang of the University of Alberta's China Institute [According to the BP Energy Outlook 2030, China is the largest source of oil consumption growth, with consumption forecast to grow by 8 million b/d a day to reach 17.5 million b/d by 2030, overtaking the US to become the world's largest oil consumer -- D.R.]. And like the US, China considers Canadian energy supplies to be vital to its security and economic growth.

About 80% of China's imports must pass through the Malacca Strait and its is keen to diversify supply chains away from vulnerable shipping lanes in Southeast Asia. [Also, please see my post "What is Beijing Willing to Do to Secure Oil and Gas Supplies?" and my post "China: Taking Oil Home," -- D.R.] [...]

While the US dithers over whether to embrace "dirty oil" [please see remarks below -- D.R.] from Canada, Chinese state-owned entities have been on a shopping spree, snapping up C$20 billion ($19.8 billion [sic]) worth of assets in less than two years and forming operating partnerships with Canadian firms for both oil sands and unconventional shale gas.

There is presently no way of shipping that oil to China, but there is a growing call in Canada to do just that.

Enbridge's proposed Northern Gateway pipeline to Canada's west coast is seen as a way of opening up overseas markets and gaining higher world oil prices. [Read more]

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Today in Energy, Jun 14, 2011, here.

(Canadian oil producers have been clamoring for an outlet for their oil to reach the Gulf Coast, reliving a glut that's accumulated in Cushing, Oklahoma, where several pipeline routes terminate --- the delivery point for the West Texas Intermediate benchmark. The large amount of oil stranded in Cushing has led to a deep discount in crude-oil prices in the region and on the New York Mercantile Exchange. In March, the U.S. State Department delayed approval of the 1.1-million-barrel-a-day TransCanada Corp. Keystone XL pipeline expansion that would bring Canadian oil to the Gulf of Mexico. Environmental groups have raised objections about the possibility of oil spills. Alberta Energy Minister Ron Liepert called for the U.S. State Department to quickly approve the extension of a controversial oil pipeline to the U.S., adding that Canada has other potential customers for its oil. Canada is the biggest supplier of foreign oil to the U.S. but Minister Liepert said Canada is "actively cultivating" relationships with China and other emerging markets, where energy demand is growing rapidly---please see MarketWatch, May 16, 2011. In regard to environmental concerns surrounding oil sands production, Minister Liepert states, “We have been a leader in terms of initiatives around the environment. We have made significant advancement in tailings [Tailings are a mixture of fine clay, silt, sand, water and residual bitumen produced through oil sands extraction -- D.R.] management. Tailings are associated only with the mining operations, which is less than 50 per cent of the oil sands production now and continues to decline as a percentage of production.” He continues, “We have a 15 dollar per ton carbon tax, and most of the large operations in the oil sands fall under that. The tax goes into a clean energy fund. Alberta only has a population of 3.5 million people, but has invested $2 billion—probably the largest of any jurisdiction in the world—into carbon capture and storage.”---please see Energy Digital, Jun 14, 2011. -- D.R.)

Saturday, May 21, 2011

Chart: History of U.S. Crude Oil Production, 1970-2010

by David Rachovich, retrieved from Aaron and David Rachovich, "U.S. Crude Oil Production, 1970-2010 -- EIA"

To view the chart (PDF format), please click here.

Please view data source for my chart.

(United States crude oil output reached its all-time peak of 9.637 million barrels per day in 1970 and began to fall rapidly and steadily after 1985. Following declines in all but one year, 1991, from 1986 to 2008, U.S. crude oil output increased in 2009 and again in 2010. -- D.R.)

Friday, May 6, 2011

United States: Oil Production from Shale Formations, 2005-2010 -- EIA

Extracted from EIA, This Week in Petroleum, Apr 27, 2011

             [Click on bar chart to enlarge]
Operators increased North Dakota's Bakken production from less than 3,000 bbl/d in 2005 to over 230,000 bbl/d in 2010. The Bakken's share of total North Dakota oil production rose from about 3 percent to about 75 percent over the same period. At the Barnett shale in Texas, overall oil production more than tripled from 2005 to 2010. Oil production from the Woodford shale in Oklahoma surpassed 4,000 bbl/d in 2010, up 42 percent from 2009 and nearly three times 2008 volumes. At the Eagle Ford shale formation in Texas, oil production, which was negligible in 2005, approached 30,000 bbl/d in 2010 [sic]. [Update: for the Eagle Ford production, please see my post/remarks here -- D.R.] Oil production from Appalachia's Marcellus shale more than doubled in 2010 from a year earlier and has grown nearly thirteen-fold since 2007. [Please see here. -- D.R.]

(U.S. production of crude oil and lease condensate increased in 2009 and again in 2010. While much of the increase in 2009 was associated with deepwater developments in the Federal Gulf of Mexico, the increase in 2010 was led by escalating horizontal drilling programs in U.S. shale plays, notably the North Dakota section of the Bakken formation---please see my post "Domestic Oil Production Reversed Decades-Long Decline in 2009 and 2010," including remarks, here. For North Dakota's oil production in historical perspective, please see my post "North Dakota ... ," remarks below, here. For the Eagle Ford shale production and development, please see my posts here and here. -- D.R.)

Thursday, April 28, 2011

[United States:] Domestic Oil Production Reversed Decades-Long Decline in 2009 and 2010

EIA, Today in Energy, Apr 27, 2011

Following declines [please see remarks below -- D.R.] in all but one year [1991] from 1986 to 2008, U.S. oil production (crude oil and lease condensate) increased in 2009 and again in 2010. Due in part to Hurricanes Ike and Gustav, average annual production dipped below 5.0 million barrels per day (MMbbl/d) in 2008, then climbed to 5.4 MMbbl/d in 2009 and 5.5 MMbbl/d in 2010, with 2010 volumes representing an 11% increase over 2008.

While much of the increase in 2009 was associated with deepwater developments in the Federal Gulf of Mexico, the increase in 2010 was led by escalating horizontal drilling programs in U.S. shale plays, notably the North Dakota section of the Bakken formation.

Operators drilling at the Bakken and other shale formations are combining horizontal wells and hydraulic fracturing - the same technologies used to significantly increase shale gas production - to boost oil production. Horizontal drilling has become especially important as oil prices have risen considerably. According to Baker Hughes rig count data, horizontal rigs comprised less than one-third of oil-directed rigs in September 2008, the previous overall rig count peak. With a tripling of horizontal oil rigs since then, that share has increased to about 46%. For further information, please see today's [Apr 27] edition of This Week in Petroleum. [Also, please see interactive charts of: 1) U.S. Oil Production, annual average, 1986-2010; and 2) U.S. Oil Production, monthly average, 2008-2010. -- D.R.]

(The decline in U.S. production in 1986 was prompted by a steep fall in Lower 48 crude production. In the late 1980s, U.S. domestic oil supply squeeze was reinforced by an initiation of decline in Alaska's output---please see my posts, including remarks, here and here. Also, please see Aaron and David Rachovich (post/table), "U.S. Crude Oil Production, 1970-2010," here. In a speech at Georgetown University in Washington, March 30th, President Obama said, "Last year, American oil production reached its highest level since 2003, and for the first time in more than a decade [last time 1997 - 49% -- D.R.], oil we imported [net imports] accounted for less than half the liquid fuel we consumed [i.e., 49%]."---please watch President Obama's speech, here. For the Bakken play and map, please see my post "Continental: Bakken's Giant Scope Underappreciated," including remarks, here. For North Dakota's oil production in historical perspective, please see my post "North Dakota ... ," remarks below, here. For U.S. shale gas resources and production, please see my post, including remarks, here. For the ongoing surge in horizontal drilling rigs, please see my post here. Also, please see my post "CERAWeek: Unconventional Gas Lifts US Petrochemicals," here. -- D.R.)



Wednesday, April 27, 2011

[United States:] Natural Gas Production/Consumption Retrospective 2010

EIA, Today in Energy, Apr 25, 2011
In 2010, the natural gas industry saw an abundance of production and strong consumption. On an average annual basis, marketed production of natural gas grew to 61.8 billion cubic feet (Bcf) per day, an increase of about 4% from 2009, despite relatively low prices. Natural gas consumption in 2010 rose to a record level of 66.1 Bcf per day, up from 62.6 Bcf per day in 2009.

In 2010, the average annual spot natural gas price at the Henry Hub increased 12% to $4.37 per million British thermal units, but remained significantly lower than average annual prices at Henry Hub for any year between 2003 and 2008.

Overall, 2010 may turn out to be an important bellwether for the industry. It represents the natural gas industry's first year without major economic upheaval since shale gas rose to prominence. Key points:

Production:

  • Marketed production of natural gas grew about 4% to 61.8 billion cubic feet (Bcf) per day, and reached its highest recorded level in the lower 48 States. The production gains in the lower 48 States more than offset declines in the Gulf of Mexico, where production continued a long-term decline.
  • Net imports of natural gas to the United States in 2010 were at the lowest level since 1994. This was a result of decreases in deliveries of liquefied natural gas from a variety of countries and increases in exports from the United States. Net imports of natural gas represented nearly 11% of total U.S. consumption, the lowest proportion since 1991.

Consumption:

  • Consumption of natural gas for electric power generation accounted for about 31% of the total annual natural gas consumed. Natural gas-fired power generation continues to displace coal-fired generation in some regions, when delivered spot prices for natural gas approach those for Appalachian coal (after accounting for the differences in gas and coal plant efficiencies).
  • Industrial use of natural gas increased 7% to 18.1 Bcf per day in 2010. Relatively low prices and an improving economy led to increase in production by gas-using industries. [Full text but please see the interactive bar chart of natural gas production, consumption and net imports -- D.R.]
(FACTS Global Energy, Singapore, said in a review of the U.S. market that rising unconventional gas output has helped contain U.S. LNG demand while higher natural gas production has helped depress U.S. gas prices---please see OGJ, Apr 20, 2011, here. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration/EIA, in the past 10 years, U.S. shale gas production has increased more than 12-fold from 0.39 trillion cubic feet/tcf in 2000 to 4.87 tcf in 2010. In 2010, U.S. shale gas production constituted 23 percent of total U.S. natural gas production. Rising production from shale gas resources has been credited with both lower natural gas prices and declining dependence on imported natural gas---please see my post > remarks > EIA data, here. -- D.R.)

Saturday, April 16, 2011

Half of U.S. Liquid Fuels Net Imports in 2010 Came from the Americas

EIA, Today in Energy, Apr 15, 2011

Notes: Imports from Saudi Arabia amounted to about 12%. Other ME excludes imports from North Africa (Algeria and Libya). -- D.R.


Based on data from the Petroleum Supply Monthly [released: Feb 25, 2011 -- D.R.], half of all U.S. net imports (imports minus exports) of liquid fuels [i.e., net imports of crude oil and petroleum products, etc.] in 2010 came from the Americas (North America, Central America, South America, and the Caribbean). Only about one-fifth of U.S. net imports came from the Middle East. For many years, the top source of U.S. liquid fuels net imports has been Canada, followed by Mexico, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, and Nigeria. With the exception of Canada, the order of these top five sources has varied from year to year.

Net imports have been a key source of supply for U.S. liquid fuels consumption over the years as the chart above indicates. After reaching a trough in the mid-1980s, net imports of liquid fuels generally rose until 2005. More recently, increases in domestic production and declines in consumption [during the recession -- D.R.] both have led to a drop in net imports of liquid fuels. Net imports of liquid fuels represented about half of U.S. liquid fuels consumption in 2010. [Full story but please see interactive graphics -- D.R.]

(U.S. total consumption of petroleum and non-petroleum liquid fuels increased by some 380,000 barrels per day or 2.0% to 19.148 million b/d in 2010, compared to the previous year. U.S. liquid fuel net imports, including both crude oil and refined products, fell from 9.667 million b/d in 2009 to 9.441 million b/d in 2010, comprising 49% of total consumption in 2010, compared with nearly 52% in 2009---please see chart/interactive above. During the same period, U.S. total liquids production grew from 9.212 million b/d to 9.755 million b/d. In retrospect, liquid fuel net imports fell from 60% of total U.S. consumption in 2005 to 49% in 2010---please see chart above. Currently, the United States still relies heavily on imported oil. In 2010, it imported 9.163 million b/d of crude oil and nearly 2.6 million b/d of refined products, according to data from the EIA---please see my post here. U.S. crude oil production last year increased by 151,000 b/d to 5.512 million b/d---please see Aaron and David Rachovich, "U.S. Crude Oil Production/Table," here. In a speech at Georgetown University in Washington, March 30th, President Obama said, "Last year, American oil production reached its highest level since 2003, and for the first time in more than a decade [last time 1997 - 49% -- D.R.], oil we imported [net imports] accounted for less than half the liquid fuel we consumed [i.e., 49%, see above -- D.R.]."---please see OGJ, Mar 30, 2011, here. Separately, for the U.S. crude oil imports alone from Top 15 countries in 2010, please see our post here. -- D.R.)

Friday, April 1, 2011

U.S. Crude Oil Production, 1970-2010 -- EIA

by Aaron and David Rachovich


United States Crude Oil Production, 1970-2010



Year
Crude Oil Production*
 (million barrels per day)

Year
Crude Oil Production*
 (million barrels per day)
1970
9.637
1991
7.417
1971
9.463
1992
7.171
1972
9.441
1993
6.847
1973
9.208
1994
6.662
1974
8.774
1995
6.560
1975
8.375
1996
6.465
1976
8.132
1997
6.452
1977
8.245
1998
6.252
1978
8.707
1999
5.881
1979
8.552
2000
5.822
1980
8.597
2001
5.801
1981
8.572
2002
5.746
1982
8.649
2003
5.681
1983
8.688
2004
5.419
1984
8.879
2005
5.178
1985
8.971
2006
5.102
1986
8.680
2007
5.064
1987
8.349
2008
4.950
1988
8.140
2009
5.361
1989
7.613
2010
5.512 (5.482 updated)
1990
7.355
 2011
UPD
5.644




*Includes lease condensate. And since the mid-2000s, oil production from shale formations.

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Please also see Figure 1. U.S. Crude Oil Production, 1970-2010

(In 1970, U.S. crude oil production was at an all-time high of 9.637 million barrels per day---please see table and Figure 1. above. Also, please see my post "United States: Domestic Oil Production Reversed Decades-Long Decline in 2009 and 2010," here. And in a speech at Georgetown University in Washington, March 30th, President Obama said, "Last year [i.e., 2010], American oil production reached its highest level since 2003, and for the first time in more than a decade [last time 1997 - 49% -- D.R.], oil we imported [net imports of both crude oil and refined products -- D.R.] accounted for less than half the liquid fuel we consumed [i.e., 49% -- D.R.]."---please see table above and my post "US to Find 'More Oil at Home,' While Cutting Consumption: President Obama," remarks below, here. Currently, the United States still relies heavily on imported oil. In 2010, it imported 9.163 million b/d of crude oil and nearly 2.6 million b/d of refined products. Half of all U.S. net imports (imports minus exports) of liquid fuels, i.e., net imports of crude oil and petroleum products, etc., in 2010 came from the Americas---please see my post "Half of U.S. Liquid Fuels Net Imports in 2010 Came from the Americas," here. Moreover, please see our post "United States: Top 8 Crude Oil Producing States, 2006-Feb.2011," and U.S. oil reserves in our post "World's Top 22 Proven Oil Reserves Holders," here. Update: please see my post "EIA Expects Higher U.S. Crude Production," UPI, Mar 7, 2012. Update 2: North Dakota passed Alaska in March 2012 to become the second-leading state in crude oil production, trailing only Texas. Recent advancements in horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing in North Dakota's Bakken shale play as well as other shale plays, such as South Texas Eagle Ford shale, have led to an increase in U.S. oil output. For a detailed account of North Dakota's oil production and its recent oil boom, please see my post "North Dakota Tops Alaska in Oil Production, Trailing Only Texas," including remarks. Furthermore, please see EIA data on weekly U.S. field production of crude oil, Jan 7, 1983 - Nov 30, 2012. -- D.R.)